|
|
|
BioMagResBank
database with sets of experimental NMR constraints corresponding to
the structures of over 1400 biomolecules deposited in the Protein Data
Bank.
|
Doreleijers JF, Mading
S, Maziuk D, Sojourner K, Yin L, Zhu J, Markley JL, Ulrich EL.
BioMagResBank, Department of Biochemistry,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
433 Babcock Drive, Madison, WI 53706,
U.S.A.
Abstract: Experimental
constraints associated with NMR structures are available from the Protein
Data Bank (PDB) in the form of 'Magnetic Resonance' (MR) files. These files
contain multiple types of data concatenated without boundary markers and
are difficult to use for further research. Reported here are the results
of a project initiated to annotate, archive, and disseminate these data to
the research community from a searchable resource in a uniform format. The
MR files from a set of 1410 NMR structures were analyzed and their original
constituent data blocks annotated as to data type using a semi-automated
protocol. A new software program called Wattos was then used to parse and
archive the data in a relational database. From the total number of MR file
blocks annotated as constraints, it proved possible to parse 84% (3337/3975).
The constraint lists that were parsed correspond to three data types (2511
distance, 788 dihedral angle, and 38 residual dipolar couplings lists) from
the three most popular software packages used in NMR structure determination:
XPLOR/CNS (2520 lists), DISCOVER (412 lists), and DYANA/DIANA (405 lists).
These constraints were then mapped to a developmental version of the BioMagResBank
(BMRB) data model. A total of 31 data types originating from 16 programs have
been classified, with the NOE distance constraint being the most commonly
observed. The results serve as a model for the development of standards for
NMR constraint deposition in computer-readable form. The constraints are updated
regularly and are available from the BMRB web site (http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu).
PMID: 12766409 [PubMed - in process]
J
Biomol NMR 2003 Jun;26(2):139-46
|
|